These companies, virtually all of whom are members of the American Shrimp Processors Association, have received over $111 million in Byrd Amendment payments from the
What is striking is that in their filing, they claim that the total gross profit for the industry for the last three years has averaged around 38 million per year - or 114 million total. The Byrd payouts have been equal to virtually the entire profits of the industry over the past three years.
Furthermore, they allege that due to the injury from lower priced imported shrimp, they have lost money in 2012.
The relevant table from their filing is below.
Page 1-45 in COGSI petition filed with Dept. of Commerce. Jump in Admin expenses highlighted in red
Through the 3rd quarter of 2012, they claim the industry's gross operating income is -7.5 million. But what jumped out at me was the staggering $10 million increase in the 'selling general and admin expense' line just above. The entire projected loss was due to a 40% jump in sales and admin, according to their filing.
Industry scuttlebutt, which has not been confirmed by any individual company, is that the members of the coalition were being asked to pay $200 to 300K to support the countervailing duty suit. It is uncannily coincidental that the jump in admin expenses of $10 million is so close to the amount raised if 30 companies had each put in $300 K - i.e. that would be a $9 million jump in admin expenses.
Now there is nothing factual here - there is no indication as to how the funds were raised, and what proportion has been paid into a legal account. But the $10 million jump in admin expense, coupled with a $7.5 million claimed loss, is a red flag.
Without that jump in administrative expense, the industry would have been profitable through the 3rd quarter of 2012, compared to the 3rd quarter (cumulative) of 2011.
The entire argument is one of injury - that the domestic shrimp processors lost money in 2012 because of a fall in shrimp prices caused by decline in the price of imported shrimp. Yet, the proximate cause was an unexplained jump in administrative expenses of $10 million, or 40% year over year.
Increases in administrative expenses are not due to the actions of foreign exporters - regardless of the merits of an argument over subsidies.
The argument for injury would be much stronger if the other factors such as administrative and sales expenses had remained more constant and consistent, as they had during the three prior years.
We address these issues in our video, and suggest that there is a better course the industry could have followed, such as putting a fraction of the $111 million they received from the government into marketing their products and raising the value, and distinctiveness of domestic shrimp.
Farmed shrimp is here to stay. It will always supply 80% to 90% of the
There are many similarities to the situation faced by the Alaskan salmon industry in the early 1990's. The explosion of farmed salmon totally turned their market upside down. They did not go to the government for a handout, but spent money marketing their product and establishing a differentiation between wild and farmed salmon.
Today despite low farmed salmon prices, canned Alaskan salmon is trading at some of the highest prices ever, and wild salmon at retail consistently gets a large premium over farmed salmon.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) The “Moringa Noodles Salad” product by Sa Giang Import-Export Corporation was honored as one of the “Top 10 Winning Products” at the THAIFEX – Anuga taste Innovation Show 2026, held as part of THAIFEX – Anuga Asia 2026 in Bangkok.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) After a fairly strong upward trend in 2025, Vietnam’s clam exports entered 2026 with a mixed picture: strong growth at the beginning of the year, followed by a slowdown from March onward. According to Vietnam Customs data, Vietnam’s clam export turnover in the first four months of 2026 reached more than USD 38 million, up 2% compared to the same period in 2025.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s pangasius industry is facing new opportunities to expand its development space as many localities and businesses begin promoting marine farming models aimed at diversifying farming areas and adapting to climate change. However, for pangasius to truly “go offshore” and develop into a large-scale industry segment, significant challenges related to technology, broodstock, and markets still need to be addressed.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s tilapia exports in April 2026 reached USD 11 million, up 92% compared to the same period in 2025. This strong growth indicates that Vietnamese tilapia products are continuing to penetrate and expand rapidly in international markets. Cumulative export turnover in the first four months of 2026 reached USD 49 million, up 151% year-on-year.
(seafood.vasep.com) At VietShrimp Asia 2026, disease management trends in shrimp farming are shifting strongly from treatment-based approaches toward proactive prevention through environmental and pond ecosystem control.
(vasep.com.vn) After a period of strong growth, with export turnover reaching USD 38 million in Q1/2026 — up 174% year-on-year — the sector’s rapid expansion clearly reflects growing market opportunities.
(vasep.com.vn) In the first quarter of 2026, Vietnam’s pangasius exports to the ASEAN bloc reached USD 44 million, up 7% compared to the same period in 2025. After falling to the lowest level of the quarter at USD 9 million in February — reflecting the seasonal slowdown in orders after the festive period — exports recovered strongly to USD 18 million in March, the highest monthly value of the quarter. This development shows that import demand for pangasius in ASEAN remains relatively stable despite short-term fluctuations.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On May 11, 2026, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced a positive comparability finding for Vietnam’s swimming crab fisheries, along with those of Indonesia and Sri Lanka, under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). With this decision, seafood and seafood products harvested from Vietnam’s swimming crab fisheries will continue to be eligible for import into the US market.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) After a slowdown in 2025, Vietnam’s tuna exports to Germany showed more positive signs in the first quarter of 2026. However, the recovery remains uncertain as consumer demand in Germany is still cautious, while market competition is increasingly driven by pricing and supply stability.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) After a sharp decline in 2025, Vietnam’s tuna exports to Israel are showing positive signs of recovery in the early months of 2026. According to Vietnam Customs data, export turnover to this market grew steadily month by month in Q1/2026, reaching nearly USD 10 million, up 33% compared to the same period in 2025. However, compared to Q1/2024, this level remains significantly lower, indicating that the recovery is still in its early stage following last year’s strong adjustment.
VASEP - HIỆP HỘI CHẾ BIẾN VÀ XUẤT KHẨU THỦY SẢN VIỆT NAM
Chịu trách nhiệm: Ông Nguyễn Hoài Nam - Phó Tổng thư ký Hiệp hội
Đơn vị vận hành trang tin điện tử: Trung tâm VASEP.PRO
Trưởng Ban Biên tập: Bà Phùng Thị Kim Thu
Giấy phép hoạt động Trang thông tin điện tử tổng hợp số 138/GP-TTĐT, ngày 01/10/2013 của Bộ Thông tin và Truyền thông
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 – (ext.203); email: kimthu@vasep.com.vn
Trụ sở: Số 7 đường Nguyễn Quý Cảnh, Phường An Phú, Quận 2, Tp.Hồ Chí Minh
Tel: (+84) 28.628.10430 - Fax: (+84) 28.628.10437 - Email: vasephcm@vasep.com.vn
VPĐD: số 10, Nguyễn Công Hoan, Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 - Fax: (+84 24) 37715084 - Email: vasephn@vasep.com.vn