With all of the media coverage on imported shrimp countervailing duties this week, the last thing I thought Id be doing with my free-time is thinking about the differences between imported and domestic shrimp. However, the attention being given to the recent trade action filed against imported shrimp got me thinking about the great hoax that has been perpetuated by some in the US wild shrimp industry regarding imported farmed shrimp.
For many years, weve heard that the major cause for the financial woes of domestic shrimp producers is the influx of cheap imported shrimp. Our domestic shrimp producers have continually bashed imported product in the media and with policy-makers, and have pursued any number of trade cases against imported shrimp in an effort to drive the price up or the demand down. In terms of full disclosure, Im friends with many domestic producers, and although I consider them to be good people, its been an exhausting steady drip of misplaced anger for as long as Ive been involved in the shrimp business.
The latest effort in this regard was filed by a group of domestic shrimp processors just last month, a trade case claiming that shrimp being imported from certain countries receive government subsidies leading to lower prices that theoretically harms our domestic producers in the marketplace.
Putting the merits of the case aside, the time has come to have a candid discussion about domestic and imported shrimp and the great hoax that has been perpetuated for far too long. There is an essential difference between shrimp. It is based on the costs of producing wild caught versus farmed shrimp.
We don't farm shrimp in the US, which is why it costs a heck of a lot more money to bring our domestic shrimp to the marketplace. Its not the same product as a farmed shrimp, and there is no way a wild product can compete on a price scale with a farmed product. Nor can wild caught shrimp compete in terms of volume, consistency, and year-round availability. The key to overcoming that significant cost difference is intense marketing to ensure consumers understand why they should pay a higher price for wild product. Wild Alaska Salmon comes to mind as a great example.
When you think about unfair trade, you generally think about identical products in the marketplace. Tires, steel, tin cans, mattress springs - you get the idea. These products are generally produced in the same way here and abroad. So if the market prices are drastically different between foreign and domestically produced tires, the case can be made for some sort of unfair market force that allows for it.
However, in the case of farmed and wild shrimp, farmed shrimp is supposed to cost less to produce than wild shrimp. Youd be running the worst farm on the planet if it doesnt. Excuse the logic here, but in my view, its ridiculous to contend that a strong wild shrimp industry in the
Curiously, that price is consistent throughout the domestic industry. The processors/distributors are the ones that ultimately bring the product to the marketplace. However, because they have failed to educate consumers as to the differences and why they should pay more for a wild product, they need to artificially keep their prices low and in-line with farmed shrimp in order to compete.
If thats the case, then of course fishermen are getting less for their product than they deserve. Naturally, they assign the blame to farmed shrimp producers as the only other competing force in the marketplace.
For those of us in the shrimp business this isnt news, but its clear from recent media reports and legal filings that many people out there still believe that the price of farmed shrimp is the reason the wild shrimp industry has never gotten the prices they feel they deserve.
The time has come to put an end to this hoax. As has been said many times, the key to success for wild US shrimp starts with domestic producers spending more effort [and money] developing and promoting their product and less effort racing to the bottom on price and then faulting farmed producers for it. Farmed and wild caught shrimp are two drastically different products that shouldnt be competing on price at the seafood counter or in the courtroom.
Tom Mazzetta
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) The year 2025 marked a pivotal milestone for Vietnam’s seafood industry in its restructuring process toward sustainability, transparency, and higher value creation, amid continued uncertainties in the global economic and trade environment. Prolonged inflation in major economies, the rising trend of trade protectionism, and increasingly stringent requirements related to environmental standards, traceability, and social responsibility have posed significant challenges to seafood production and exports. Nevertheless, overcoming these pressures, Vietnam’s seafood sector has gradually demonstrated its adaptability, maintained growth momentum, and laid an important foundation for the next stage of development.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Amid the increasingly evident impacts of drought and saltwater intrusion, the shrimp-rice production model in Ca Mau province continues to prove itself as a viable direction, contributing to higher farmer incomes, improved soil conditions and the promotion of ecological and sustainable agricultural development.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) The management of fishing vessels, monitoring of fishing activities, and handling of violations in the fisheries sector in Lam Dong province have continued to be implemented in a synchronized and stringent manner, contributing to raising awareness of legal compliance among fishermen and aiming to end illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Can Tho’s fishery industry sustained steady growth in 2025 with total aquatic and marine output reaching nearly 783,000 tons, fulfilling 100% of the annual target. Aquaculture, capture fisheries and fishing fleet management were further strengthened, aiming for sustainable development in the coming years.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In 2025, Vietnam’s pangasius export turnover reached nearly USD 2.2 billion, up 8% year-on-year. This result indicates that pangasius exports maintained their growth momentum despite significant volatility in the global market environment. In December 2025, pangasius export value reached USD 200 million, up 10% compared to December 2024. This solid performance in the final month of the year reflects increased import demand for consumption and inventory replenishment in key markets.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In 2025, Vietnam’s tuna exports to Spain experienced significant fluctuations. According to Vietnam Customs, during the first 11 months of 2025, export turnover for the first 11 months of the year edged up by 0.3% year-on-year, reaching nearly $15 million.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Deputy Prime Minister Bui Thanh Son has signed Decision No. 16/QD-TTg, dated January 5, 2026, approving the implementation plan for the Vietnam-Israel Free Trade Agreement (VIFTA). Under the plan, in the coming period, ministries, ministerial-level agencies, government-affiliated entities and People’s Committees of provinces and centrally-run cities must institutionalize and execute tasks focused on the dissemination of information regarding VIFTA and the Israeli market; legislative and institutional development, as well as enhancing competitiveness and human resource growth...
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Beyond achieving double-digit growth, Vietnam’s fish cake and surimi exports are showing a notable year-end "inflection point": the EU his accelerating with nearly twofold growth, China & Hong Kong are rising sharply, while the largest market, South Korea, signaled a slowdown in November. According to Vietnam Customs data, export turnover of fish cake and surimi reached $327 million in the first 11 months of 2025, up 22% year-on-year; November 2025 alone accounted for $35 million, marking a 5% increase. This serves as a critical foundation for exporters to reassess market structures and competitive intensity while finalizing order strategies for 2026.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Ca Mau, widely regarded as the nation’s “shrimp capital”, continued its strong performance in 2025 as shrimp output reached nearly 600,000 tons, maintaining its position as Vietnam’s leading shrimp-producing locality.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On December 29, 2025, at the 2025 Pangasius Industry Review Conference held in Can Tho City, the Vietnam Pangasius Association announced that fingerling prices have surged to record levels due to acute supply shortages.
VASEP - HIỆP HỘI CHẾ BIẾN VÀ XUẤT KHẨU THỦY SẢN VIỆT NAM
Chịu trách nhiệm: Ông Nguyễn Hoài Nam - Phó Tổng thư ký Hiệp hội
Đơn vị vận hành trang tin điện tử: Trung tâm VASEP.PRO
Trưởng Ban Biên tập: Bà Phùng Thị Kim Thu
Giấy phép hoạt động Trang thông tin điện tử tổng hợp số 138/GP-TTĐT, ngày 01/10/2013 của Bộ Thông tin và Truyền thông
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 – (ext.203); email: kimthu@vasep.com.vn
Trụ sở: Số 7 đường Nguyễn Quý Cảnh, Phường An Phú, Quận 2, Tp.Hồ Chí Minh
Tel: (+84) 28.628.10430 - Fax: (+84) 28.628.10437 - Email: vasephcm@vasep.com.vn
VPĐD: số 10, Nguyễn Công Hoan, Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 - Fax: (+84 24) 37715084 - Email: vasephn@vasep.com.vn