With all of the media coverage on imported shrimp countervailing duties this week, the last thing I thought Id be doing with my free-time is thinking about the differences between imported and domestic shrimp. However, the attention being given to the recent trade action filed against imported shrimp got me thinking about the great hoax that has been perpetuated by some in the US wild shrimp industry regarding imported farmed shrimp.
For many years, weve heard that the major cause for the financial woes of domestic shrimp producers is the influx of cheap imported shrimp. Our domestic shrimp producers have continually bashed imported product in the media and with policy-makers, and have pursued any number of trade cases against imported shrimp in an effort to drive the price up or the demand down. In terms of full disclosure, Im friends with many domestic producers, and although I consider them to be good people, its been an exhausting steady drip of misplaced anger for as long as Ive been involved in the shrimp business.
The latest effort in this regard was filed by a group of domestic shrimp processors just last month, a trade case claiming that shrimp being imported from certain countries receive government subsidies leading to lower prices that theoretically harms our domestic producers in the marketplace.
Putting the merits of the case aside, the time has come to have a candid discussion about domestic and imported shrimp and the great hoax that has been perpetuated for far too long. There is an essential difference between shrimp. It is based on the costs of producing wild caught versus farmed shrimp.
We don't farm shrimp in the US, which is why it costs a heck of a lot more money to bring our domestic shrimp to the marketplace. Its not the same product as a farmed shrimp, and there is no way a wild product can compete on a price scale with a farmed product. Nor can wild caught shrimp compete in terms of volume, consistency, and year-round availability. The key to overcoming that significant cost difference is intense marketing to ensure consumers understand why they should pay a higher price for wild product. Wild Alaska Salmon comes to mind as a great example.
When you think about unfair trade, you generally think about identical products in the marketplace. Tires, steel, tin cans, mattress springs - you get the idea. These products are generally produced in the same way here and abroad. So if the market prices are drastically different between foreign and domestically produced tires, the case can be made for some sort of unfair market force that allows for it.
However, in the case of farmed and wild shrimp, farmed shrimp is supposed to cost less to produce than wild shrimp. Youd be running the worst farm on the planet if it doesnt. Excuse the logic here, but in my view, its ridiculous to contend that a strong wild shrimp industry in the
Curiously, that price is consistent throughout the domestic industry. The processors/distributors are the ones that ultimately bring the product to the marketplace. However, because they have failed to educate consumers as to the differences and why they should pay more for a wild product, they need to artificially keep their prices low and in-line with farmed shrimp in order to compete.
If thats the case, then of course fishermen are getting less for their product than they deserve. Naturally, they assign the blame to farmed shrimp producers as the only other competing force in the marketplace.
For those of us in the shrimp business this isnt news, but its clear from recent media reports and legal filings that many people out there still believe that the price of farmed shrimp is the reason the wild shrimp industry has never gotten the prices they feel they deserve.
The time has come to put an end to this hoax. As has been said many times, the key to success for wild US shrimp starts with domestic producers spending more effort [and money] developing and promoting their product and less effort racing to the bottom on price and then faulting farmed producers for it. Farmed and wild caught shrimp are two drastically different products that shouldnt be competing on price at the seafood counter or in the courtroom.
Tom Mazzetta
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On the afternoon of March 19, Vice Chairman of the Ca Mau Provincial People’s Committee, Le Van Su, chaired a meeting to address bottlenecks and propose solutions to expand the super-intensive whiteleg shrimp farming model using low water exchange and high biosecurity standards (RAS-IMTA).
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On March 10, 2026, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee issued Decision No. 1377/QD-UBND approving the Aquatic Animal Disease Prevention and Control Plan for the 2026–2030 period. The decision takes effect from the date of signing and replaces previous plans for the 2021–2030 period that had been issued prior to the administrative merger in Ba Ria – Vung Tau, Binh Duong, and Ho Chi Minh City.
(vasep.com.vn) In 2025, Chile imported more than USD 156 million worth of tuna, up 8.1% compared to the previous year and the highest level in the past five years. As the supply structure in this market is rapidly shifting, Vietnamese tuna is facing both opportunities to expand market share and increasing competitive pressure from Thailand, Colombia, and China.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vinh Long Province is stepping up efforts to develop brackish water shrimp farming in a sustainable direction, identifying it as a key sector in its agricultural structure. In 2026, the province aims to reach around 71,300 hectares of shrimp farming, with an output of over 314,000 tons.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Ha Tinh Province is strengthening control over shrimp seed quality to minimize risks for the 2026 spring–summer farming season.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In February 2026, Vietnam’s pangasius exports reached USD 119 million, down slightly 5% year-on-year. However, thanks to strong performance in January, cumulative exports in the first two months of the year still reached USD 331 million, up 28% compared to the same period in 2025. Export activity slowed somewhat in February due to seasonal factors, particularly the Lunar New Year holiday, which disrupted production and shipments at many seafood processing enterprises.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Da Nang is accelerating the development of high-tech shrimp farming toward intensive production, disease control, and improved efficiency. Many shrimp farms have invested in automated environmental monitoring systems, continuously tracking indicators such as pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and salinity, enabling farmers to promptly adjust pond conditions and reduce disease risks.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) The year 2025 is considered a turning point for Vietnam’s shrimp seed industry as the sector faces the need for strong transformation in technology, production management, and gradual self-sufficiency in broodstock supply. These factors are seen as key to improving seed quality and strengthening the competitiveness of the shrimp industry amid increasingly demanding market requirements.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In February 2026, Vietnam’s shrimp exports reached nearly USD 310 million, up 17% year-on-year. Cumulatively for the first two months of the year, shrimp export value totaled USD 690 million, an increase of 20% compared with the same period last year. Compared with the 22% growth recorded in January, the pace of increase in February slowed somewhat, reflecting seasonal factors as the Lunar New Year holiday partially disrupted processing and shipment activities. Nevertheless, the nearly 20% growth in the first two months indicates that shrimp orders from Vietnam are maintaining a more positive trend than in the same period last year.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) According to the latest statistics for January 2026, Vietnam’s pangasius export value to major market blocs recorded encouraging growth compared with the same period last year, indicating that consumption demand is gradually recovering.
VASEP - HIỆP HỘI CHẾ BIẾN VÀ XUẤT KHẨU THỦY SẢN VIỆT NAM
Chịu trách nhiệm: Ông Nguyễn Hoài Nam - Phó Tổng thư ký Hiệp hội
Đơn vị vận hành trang tin điện tử: Trung tâm VASEP.PRO
Trưởng Ban Biên tập: Bà Phùng Thị Kim Thu
Giấy phép hoạt động Trang thông tin điện tử tổng hợp số 138/GP-TTĐT, ngày 01/10/2013 của Bộ Thông tin và Truyền thông
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 – (ext.203); email: kimthu@vasep.com.vn
Trụ sở: Số 7 đường Nguyễn Quý Cảnh, Phường An Phú, Quận 2, Tp.Hồ Chí Minh
Tel: (+84) 28.628.10430 - Fax: (+84) 28.628.10437 - Email: vasephcm@vasep.com.vn
VPĐD: số 10, Nguyễn Công Hoan, Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 - Fax: (+84 24) 37715084 - Email: vasephn@vasep.com.vn