But this does not mean an end for the eco-label, as consumers still want to see it on their cans of tuna, an importer told IntraFish.
“Once you’ve established it, if you then pull away from it people are going to be suspicious, so you have to be very careful,” he said.
“The Dolphin friendly thing is a bit like airbags in a car, it’s good to know it’s there but you never want to use it or hope it is going to be a problem. I think it would be a brave firm who took it off."
In order for tuna to be considered “Dolphin Safe” it must meet five particular standards.
First, there must be no intentional chasing, netting or encirclement of dolphins during an entire tuna fishing trip.
Secondly there must also be no use of drift gillnets to catch tuna or any accidental killing or serious injury to any dolphins during net sets.
And there must be no mixing of dolphin-safe and dolphin-deadly tuna in individual boat wells (for accidental kill of dolphins), or in processing or storage facilities.
Finally, each trip in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean by vessels 400 gross tons and above must have an independent observer on board attesting to the compliance with the previous points.
“At one time it was incredibly important,” Bill Fox, vice president for fisheries at the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) told IntraFish.
“In the past dolphin mortality was quite high, but it has largely had its effect. Mortality is down to about as low a level as you could minimize it now, direct mortality anyway."
Dolphins used to be a common by-catch in tuna fisheries, especially in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean, as they commonly swim with schools of yellowfin tuna.
The dolphins, which swim closer to the surface than tuna, were used as an indicator that tuna was present.
“When it first came out 20 or so years ago it was very relevant,” added the importer. “When images were coming out of dolphins being caught in drift nets...tuna sales all around the world were badly hit."
And inevitably the Earth Island Institute, which owns the label, believes the label not only continues to have a relevance today but will continue long into the future.
“We still think it’s extremely valid," said Mark Palmer, associate director of the International Marine Mammal Project at the Earth Island Institute.
"It covers more than just dolphins, it covers a variety of other bycatch issues that we’ve been involved in for a number of years, and we were the first one to bring to the attention of tuna companies so we think it is very relevant from those standpoints."
However, it is possible to argue the case to remove the label in markets such as the UK, another importer told IntraFish, as it is really only relates to yellowfin tuna stocks. Dolphins do not associate with skipjack tuna and the UK market is predominantly skipjack, he said.
However, the Earth Island Institutes's Palmer said despite this, dolphins and other species such as sea turtles and sharks -- which the dolphin safe label also covers -- are still being killed by various fishing techniques for skipjack tuna, predominantly through the use of fish aggregating devices (FADs).
"They are still killing some dolphins, not huge numbers, but there are some that are dying," Palmer said.
"There’s also the issue of bycatch of some other species through the FAD fishing that need to be addressed so we are looking at that as well."
Eastern Tropical
There has been controversy surrounding the label in the past, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling in May 2012 the dolphin safe label, as used in the United States, focuses too narrowly on fishing methods, and too narrowly on the Eastern Tropical Pacific, and does not address dolphin mortalities in other parts of the world.
The WTO even went as far to say that the label unnecessarily restricts trade and effectively blocks non-US suppliers from the American market.
Mexico’s tuna industry is one of the main sectors affected by the dolphin safe label and Mexican-caught fish have found it difficult to obtain the label in the past, causing US tuna brands to exclude them.
"We still have the government of Mexico fighting us tooth and nail, now with the World Trade Organization as well," said Palmer.
"They continue to kill dolphins with their fisheries as does Venezuela and Colombia, so it is still an issue in the Eastern Tropical Pacific as far as large number of dolphins being killed."
Palmer believes the number of dolphins being killed could be brought down to zero, if these fisheries "stop setting their nets on dolphins."
The controversial fisheries claim to kill about 1,000 dolphins a year, but "we think it is much higher according to National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) studies of the dolphin populations," he said.
All encompassing label
However, the only way that the dolphin safe label is likely to disappear is if some other “all embracing label” is created, an importer said.
“Why don’t they embrace with the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) for example and do something like that?” said. “Otherwise you are going to have too many eco-labels on a packet."
“If you could have one label that says 'I know it’s going to be dolphin safe, I know there is going to be no by-catch, I know it is going to be no slave labor in the factories, I know it is recyclable packages,' that is where you want to get to eventually," the importer said. "But that is a long way off, because there are too many vested interests."
According to Palmer, this is something that has already been addressed by the Earth Island Institute, and the group has already approached the MSC, looking for some sort of collaborative approach.
"We have talked with the MSC about the possibility of them adopting the Dolphin Safe standards automatically as part of their MSC standards, and they won’t do that," said Palmer.
"They have said no, they go about it in a different way. They really don’t have the kind of by-catch protections that you might think from an eco-label."
The MSC's real strength is with the issue of overfishing, said Palmer, and by-catch is very much a "secondary issue," he said.
The work surrounding the Dolphin Safe label and the Earth Island Institute is mainly funded by donations, said Palmer, with some company's contributing and some not.
However if companies want to sell tuna with the eco-label on their products they do have to pay a small fee, albeit extremely minimal.
"We get a lot [of donations] from tuna import associations and companies in the UK and Germany in particular, we also get a lot from the Thailand companies," Palmer said. "It varies considerably depending on which company and it is all on a voluntary basis, what they are willing to give us."
The company does charge for the use of their logo -- roughly one cent per case.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Although Germany’s tuna imports have declined, Vietnam’s tuna exports to the market continue to show positive signs. Notably, export value recovered strongly in Q3/2026, and German import data also show Vietnamese products strengthening their position amid competition among suppliers.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Seafood exports are holding double-digit growth, but the opportunities are not spread evenly across product groups and markets. As businesses draw up their plans for 2027, Vietnam Seafood Summit 2026 (VSS2026) offers a chance to look ahead together: what to sell, where to sell it, and how to prepare for growth in the coming years.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) With less than two weeks to go, the Vietnam Seafood Summit 2026 (VSS 2026) will officially take place in Can Tho. Under the theme “Seafood Market Outlook 2027–2029 – Opportunities and Potential for Double-Digit Export Growth,” the Summit is organized by VASEP at a time when seafood businesses are facing rapid market shifts, changing buyer demand, trade policy changes and growing competitive pressure all at once.
(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On October 28, 2026, the China Fisheries & Seafood Expo opened in Qingdao, China. The expo takes place over three days from October 28 to 30, 2026. This is a prestigious specialized seafood exhibition organized annually by Sea Fare Exposition Inc.
(vasep.com.vn) In the first nine months of 2026, Vietnam’s tilapia exports to the CPTPP bloc reached $7 million, marking a 51% year-on-year increase. The bloc rstands as the fourth-largest market for Vietnamese tilapia, trailing Brazil, the US, and Saudi Arabia.
(vasep.com.vn) VASEP has officially announced the program for Vietnam Seafood Summit 2026 (VSS 2026), featuring five in-depth sessions covering industry outlooks, trade barriers, buyer demand, the domestic market, and solutions to improve productivity and reduce costs across the seafood value chain.
(vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s shrimp exports reached US$3.7 billion in the first nine months of 2026, up 11% year on year. Although growth has been supported by China and several markets within the CPTPP, momentum is slowing as exports to the United States and the European Union decline. Tariff pressures, international competition, and raw material challenges are creating significant hurdles for exporters in the final months of the year.
(vasep.com.vn) Markets are changing faster, buyer requirements are becoming more demanding, and trade barriers are growing increasingly complex. In this environment, seafood businesses need more than an understanding of current market conditions. They need a longer-term perspective to answer a critical question: Where will growth opportunities come from in 2027–2029, and what should businesses do now to prepare? This is one of the key reasons why VASEP is organizing Vietnam Seafood Summit 2026.
(vasep.com.vn) In the first eight months of 2026, Vietnam’s pangasius exports to the Middle East reached US$113 million, up 7% year on year from the same period in 2025. Growth has become more pronounced in recent months. In August alone, exports to the region totaled US$20 million, an increase of 24%. This indicates that demand for Vietnamese pangasius in the Middle East is gradually recovering after a slowdown in March, although the pace of recovery varies across markets.
(vasep.com.vn) China’s shrimp imports continued to grow strongly in 2026, while Vietnam’s shrimp exports to the market also recorded notable growth. However, behind these positive figures lie two distinct trends: Chinese consumption is growing more slowly than imports, and lobster accounts for a substantial share of Vietnam’s shrimp exports to China, making its product mix significantly different from those of Ecuador and India. Exporters therefore need to assess each segment carefully to understand the opportunities and risks.
VASEP - HIỆP HỘI CHẾ BIẾN VÀ XUẤT KHẨU THỦY SẢN VIỆT NAM
Chịu trách nhiệm: Ông Nguyễn Hoài Nam - Phó Tổng thư ký Hiệp hội
Đơn vị vận hành trang tin điện tử: Trung tâm VASEP.PRO
Trưởng Ban Biên tập: Bà Phùng Thị Kim Thu
Giấy phép hoạt động Trang thông tin điện tử tổng hợp số 138/GP-TTĐT, ngày 01/10/2013 của Bộ Thông tin và Truyền thông
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 – (ext.203); email: kimthu@vasep.com.vn
Trụ sở: Số 7 đường Nguyễn Quý Cảnh, Phường An Phú, Quận 2, Tp.Hồ Chí Minh
Tel: (+84) 28.628.10430 - Fax: (+84) 28.628.10437 - Email: vasephcm@vasep.com.vn
VPĐD: số 10, Nguyễn Công Hoan, Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội
Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 - Fax: (+84 24) 37715084 - Email: vasephn@vasep.com.vn