Aquaculture and fisheries economic development – examples from Norway and Vietnam

Other 09:59 04/10/2018
This is the presentation of Prof. Ola Flateen (Tromso University, Norway) in the Conference “Future perspective of fisheries and aquaculture” in the framework of Vietfish 2018

Norway and Vietnam: similarities and differences

Similarities: Size (length and area), Coastal area, Fishing and aquaculture nations

Differences: Population, Economy, GDP, Natural resources, Location – N in the North and Vn in the South - and this consequently creates different climate and weather conditions

HDI: N (0.944) – ranked 1st, Vn (0.638) ranked 121st

Transparency: N - 3rd in the world, Vn ranked 107th

Disputed sea areas and fishing rights?

Norway has settled, according to the Law of the sea, all EEZ disputes, including with Russia and EU.

Annual negotiations and share agreements on Total allowable catches (TACs) and other fishing issues.

The South of China Sea disputes are still unsettled? This creates competition between nations and de facto open access fisheries.

Fisheries Management and Governance

Vietnam: Open access, Small scale, Some high-liner/intra-marginal rent (IMR), but no resource rent

Norway: Regulated, Large scale, Some resource rent and IMR in capture fishing, and very high economic rent in aquaculture (ERA)

What is a (fishery) subsidy?

WTO: ”…(i) financial contributions (ii) by a government or public body (iii) that confer a benefit”, all three conditions must be met

Why harmful in fisheries?

- Incentives for increased output, endangering fish stocks and reducing potential long term resource rent and profit

- Trade distortion through provision of advantages for one exporting country (if underdeveloped stocks)

Fuel subsidies and environmental tax exemptions

Governmental financial transfers to the fishery sector are not necessarily subsidies, nor necessarily harmful – FAO/WTO/OECD reports (Example: Research versus Trawler)

Sumaila et al. (2010): Good, bad or ambiguous (ugly) subsidies

Fishery subsidies and profitability effects

Short run (2 years) effects fuel subsidies:

Profitability when the Government’s subsidy action takes place is greater than profitability without this action.

The increased profitability of the vessels is a result of both revenue-enhancing and cost-reducing subsidy schemes

More benefits for the owners than for the crewmembers.

Positive impacts on the OCF of large vessels but negative effects on their IMR, while the positive effects on the rent of small vessels.

Key findings of Thuy et al., 2018

In Vietnam, offshore vessels are profitable even without subsidies

Higher education, more experience and type of fishing gear decide the likelihood  of vessel owners taking part in the subsidy program

Remaining questions outside the scope of this project: What are the long term effects for fish stocks and harvest?

Subsidies and politics

Finley (2017) argues that much of the overcapacity that built up in the decades after World War II came about because of government subsidies, and that these subsidies largely were instruments in Cold War politics.

On high seas fishing subsidies:

Our results suggest that fishing at the current scale is enabled by large government subsidies, without which as much as 54% of the present high-seas fishing grounds would be unprofitable at current fishing rates (Sala et al., 2018).

Dear participants, do you think such arguments play a role today for countries like China in the South of China Sea?

The world total fish production increases due to aquaculture

Aquaculture production 2015, in quantity (thousand tonnes) and value (million USD), as well as the average annual change in the period 1985–2015. 74 countries ranked according to value (Sources: see Flaaten 2018 Ch.11)

Rank

Country

Production

Average annual change (%)

   

Quantity

Value

iqty

ival

1

China

60166.82

77412.90

8.87

10.42

2

India

5061.02

10612.68

7.09

10.05

3

Indonesia

15012.30

9670.64

12.58

11.29

4

Chile

1142.55

8586.29

16.52

22.86

5

Viet Nam

3402.27

8207.86

11.03

12.72

6

Norway

1356.69

6441.34

12.70

12.44

Cost structure of three aquaculture industries, at farm gate

Cost item

Pangasius, Vietnam3, 2016

White leg shrimp Vietnam3, 2014

Salmon Norway, 2016

Cost shares %

Cost shares %

Cost shares %

Smolt/seed

10.4

11.88

9.39

Feed

81.84

41.17

42.97

Labour1

1.08

4.91

6.73

Insurance

   

0.38

Pond rental

1.05

   

Power

 

11.68

 

Other operating cost

3.474

13.065

25.722

Depreciation

0.45

17.306

5.32

Net financial cost

1.16

-7

-0.12

Operating cost, all

99.44

100

90.4

Slaughter

0.56

-8

9.63

Total cost

100

100

100

Additional info on Cost structure of three aquaculture industries. Cost and revenue per kg fish at farm gate

Table notes:

May include some management cost

Includes repair, maintenance, administration, fish health, energy, and environmental measures

Dong Thap province and South Central Vietnam for pangasius and shrimp, respectively

Includes Chemicals/pharmacy, power, pond regeneration and materials

Pond regeneration is partly included in Labour

Includes maintenance and other fixed cost

Net financial cost is very small. Some may have been included in Other

The buyer usually harvest the shrimp and carry the cost (some cost to the farmer could be included in Labour)

Three aquaculture industries, cost and revenue per kg fish at farm gate (Sources: see Flaaten, 2018 Ch.11) 

Items

Pangasius, Vietnam3, 2016

White leg shrimp Vietnam3, 2014

Salmon Norway, 2016

Total cost, national currency

21 440.00

108 832.40

33.86

Revenue, national currency

22 600.00

120 336.06

50.59

Profit

1 160.00

11503.66

16.73

Exchange rate, per USD

22 368.25

21 193.08

8.4

Total cost, USD

0.96

5.14

4.03

Revenue, USD

1.01

5.68

6.02

Profit margin

5.1

9.5

33.1

Pangasius production and export, Vietnam 2000-2017

 

Atlantic salmon export, Norway 1981-2016

 

Antibiotics used in Norwegian aquaculture and the production of salmonids, 1975-2016

The tradeoff between wild and farmed salmon

Wild salmon: Used to be additional income for small scale fishermen; Now, mainly recreational fishing. Use and non-use values

Aquaculture production: Huge export value; Salmon lice, surplus feed, feces and escapees are the main externalities, including effects on wild fish

Economic rent in aquaculture (ERA)

Economic rent in aquaculture (ERA) is any payment to a farm and site owner, on land or sea, in excess of the costs needed to bring that farm into production. For analytic and policy purposes it may be useful to distinguish among different types of ERA, including oligopoly rent from access regulation (licensing) and hampered output

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway and white leg shrimp  (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Vietnam, two successful aquaculture cases.

Analyses indicate very high profit and ERA rates in the Norwegian salmon industry and positive, but lower rates in the Vietnamese white leg shrimp farming.

Aquaculture rent (ERA) can be calculated from costs and earnings data. Concepts, and Norway 2016

Concept

Explanation

ERA for salmon and trout in Norway, 2016 Million NOK (million USD)

Revenue

Farm gate value of sale of fish.

50,072.31

(5,961.0)

-          Total operating expenses

Including depreciation of farm, license and permit.

32,035.0

= Operating profit (EBIT)

Earnings before interest and tax.

18,037.3

+    Total financial revenue

Financial income and currency gains.

530.7

-          Total financial expenses

Financial cost and currency rate losses.

495.4

= Profit on ordinary activities before tax (EBT)

 

18,072.6

+ Depreciation on intangible capital

Intangible capital includes licenses and permits.

-12.52

+ Financial cost of intangible capital

Financial cost (interests, fees) of license and permit purchases.

226.53

-          Calculated interest on equity

Equal to what is paid on long term loans, or government bonds (opportunity cost).

917.63

= Economic rent in aquaculture (ERA) unadjusted

The residual for the aquaculture industry owners, without deduction of environmental and management cost.

17,369.0

(2,067.7)

Economic rent per kg

ERA divided by quantity sold at farm gate – per kg

18.22

(2.17)

Operating margin

EBIT in percent of revenue

36.0

Profit margin4

EBT in percent of revenue

36.1

Economic rent margin

ERA in percent of revenue

34.7

Aquaculture rent (ERA) can be calculated from costs and earnings data. Concepts.

Concept

Explanation

Revenue

Farm gate value of sale of fish.

-          Total operating expenses

Including depreciation of farm, license and permit.

= Operating profit (EBIT)

Earnings before interest and tax.

      +    Total financial revenue

Financial income and currency gains.

-          Total financial expenses

Financial cost and currency rate losses.

= Profit on ordinary activities before tax (EBT)

 

       + Depreciation on intangible capital

Intangible capital includes licenses and permits.

       + Financial cost of intangible capital

Financial cost (interests, fees) of license and permit purchases.

-          Calculated interest on equity

Equal to what is paid on long term loans, or government bonds (opportunity cost).

Aquaculture rent (ERA) can be calculated from costs and earnings data. Concepts and Norway 2016

= Economic rent in aquaculture (ERA) unadjusted (USD)

The residual for the aquaculture industry owners, without deduction of environmental and management cost.

17,369.0

(2,067.7)

Economic rent per kg (USD)

ERA divided by quantity sold at farm gate – per kg

18.22 (2.17)

Operating margin

EBIT in percent of revenue

36.0

Profit margin4

EBT in percent of revenue

36.1

Economic rent margin

ERA in percent of revenue

34.7

Aquaculture rent (ERA) for salmon in Norway and white leg shrimp in Vietnam 

 

 

Norway-salmon,

2016

Vietnam-white leg shrimp 2014 (4 provinc)

= Economic rent in aquaculture (ERA) unadjusted

The residual for the aquaculture industry owners, without deduction of environmental and management cost.

mill. NOK       17,369.0

(mill. USD)     (2,067.7)

mill. VND     1,492,106.3

(mill. USD)              (69.8)

Profit margin4

EBT in percent of revenue

36.1

9.6

Economic rent margin

ERA in percent of revenue

34.7

7.2

Lessons learned (fisheries and aquaculture)

From the Law of the Sea – establish internationally agreed national rights and obligations in previous disputed seas, and then avoid domestic rent dissipating competition.

Get rid of national capacity and effort expanding government financial transfers (GFT) (Bad subsidies)

GFT to for example infrastructure, safety measures, social security, as well as to monitoring, control and surveillance can be Good subsidies 

User and property rights in aquaculture

Environmental control (feed and medicine remains, disease, escapee…)

Food safety

Utilise branding (VASEP, Norwegian Seafood Council) and market power 

The presentation of Prof. Ola Flateen (Tromso University, Norway) in the framework of Vietfish 2018

TIN MỚI CẬP NHẬT

Vietnamese pangasius: from export recovery to the need for upgrading the value chain

 |  09:24 04/06/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s pangasius exports have shown encouraging signs of recovery in 2026. In the first four months of the year, total export turnover reached USD 720 million, up 17% compared to the same period last year. This result reflects improving demand across many markets, as well as the efforts of Vietnamese pangasius enterprises to maintain production, secure orders, and adapt to changing market conditions.

Vietnamese tilapia accelerates growth, creating opportunities to upgrade product structure

 |  09:20 02/06/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In the first four months of 2026, Vietnam’s tilapia exports reached USD 49 million, up 151% compared to the same period in 2025. This impressive growth reflects positive momentum in the tilapia sector, with Brazil emerging as a key driver of growth, while frozen tilapia fillets continued to be the industry's leading export product.

Vietnam’s tuna market share in the UK expands while overall imports decline sharply

 |  08:50 31/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s tuna exports to the UK have shown positive signs in the first months of 2026. While the UK’s overall tuna imports from the world declined, imports from Vietnam increased strongly, indicating that there is still room for Vietnam to expand its market share. However, behind this growth, competitive pressure remains intense, especially as the UK continues to be a major market for established suppliers such as Ecuador, Mauritius, and Ghana.

Ca Mau pilots Biofloc technology in rice–shrimp farming models

 |  09:23 29/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Biofloc technology is being piloted in several rice–shrimp farming models in Ca Mau Province, showing initial positive results in controlling pond environments, improving shrimp seed quality, and supporting sustainable aquaculture development.

Latin America emerges as a growth driver for Vietnam’s pangasius exports

 |  09:21 28/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In the first four months of 2026, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia together contributed USD 108 million to Vietnam’s pangasius exports, accounting for around 15% of the industry’s total export turnover. Amid tightening global whitefish supply and slowing demand in several traditional markets, Latin America is increasingly becoming an important expansion destination for the sector.

Ha Tinh expands high-tech red tilapia farming

 |  09:18 27/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Alongside the development of high-tech shrimp farming, Ha Tinh Province is accelerating the cultivation of high-value freshwater aquatic species, with red tilapia emerging as an effective and sustainable farming model.

Vietnamese tuna exports seek momentum from growth markets

 |  09:00 25/05/2026

(vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s tuna exports reached USD 81 million in April 2026, down 6% compared to the same period in 2025. In the first four months of the year, export turnover totaled USD 289 million, down 4.8%. Although the overall export picture has yet to brighten significantly, market trends are becoming increasingly diversified rather than moving in a single direction.

Pangasius industry restructures from broodstock to enhance competitiveness

 |  08:59 23/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s pangasius industry is undergoing strong restructuring starting from the broodstock and fingerling segment in order to improve productivity, quality, and export competitiveness. This is considered a critical foundation for the sustainable development of the industry amid rising production costs and increasingly stringent market requirements.

Pangasius exports in April 2026 rise 18%, U.S. market shows signs of recovery

 |  08:21 21/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) According to Vietnam Customs data, pangasius exports in April 2026 reached USD 206 million, up 18% compared to the same period in 2025 — marking another consecutive month of double-digit growth since the beginning of the year. Cumulative pangasius export turnover in the first four months of 2026 reached USD 720 million, up 17% year-on-year, reflecting the positive growth momentum of this key export product.

Shrimp exports in the first four months of 2026: Stable demand from Asia, rising pressure from the US market

 |  08:55 19/05/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vietnam’s shrimp exports in the first four months of 2026 maintained positive growth momentum, reaching approximately USD 1.5 billion, up 15% compared to the same period last year. However, behind this result lies diverging trends across markets, as the global shrimp industry continues to face pressure from inflation, high inventories, price competition, and increasing trade risks.

VASEP - HIỆP HỘI CHẾ BIẾN VÀ XUẤT KHẨU THỦY SẢN VIỆT NAM

Chịu trách nhiệm: Ông Nguyễn Hoài Nam - Phó Tổng thư ký Hiệp hội

Đơn vị vận hành trang tin điện tử: Trung tâm VASEP.PRO

Trưởng Ban Biên tập: Bà Phùng Thị Kim Thu

Giấy phép hoạt động Trang thông tin điện tử tổng hợp số 138/GP-TTĐT, ngày 01/10/2013 của Bộ Thông tin và Truyền thông

Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 – (ext.203); email: kimthu@vasep.com.vn

Trụ sở: Số 7 đường Nguyễn Quý Cảnh, Phường An Phú, Quận 2, Tp.Hồ Chí Minh

Tel: (+84) 28.628.10430 - Fax: (+84) 28.628.10437 - Email: vasephcm@vasep.com.vn

VPĐD: số 10, Nguyễn Công Hoan, Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội

Tel: (+84 24) 3.7715055 - Fax: (+84 24) 37715084 - Email: vasephn@vasep.com.vn

© Copyright 2020 - Mọi hình thức sao chép phải được sự chấp thuận bằng văn bản của VASEP

DANH MỤC