Big increase in number of FDA warning letters to seafood processors seen in 2011

News 15:54 05/03/2012

(seafood.com) FDA posts Warning Letters each week, which stay on its website for a few days and then “disappear” into an archive and become difficult to find. Those concerning seafood are reported in our Trade Alerts when they are posted.

Warning letters target violations of “regulatory significance” and include a threat of legal action if you don't comply. While all are serious (some provide damaging evidence to competitors and for criminal prosecutions and class-action lawsuits), others have more immediate consequences. Foreign facilities, for example, face the prospect of refusals under an Import Alert.<o:p></o:p> Because these letters are a surrogate measure of FDA's enforcement activities, any significant change in their number should raise questions about what's going on - and a significant change has occurred.<o:p></o:p> What Happened?<o:p></o:p> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 15pt; margin: 6pt 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal">Starting in late 2009, the number of seafood letters began to increase significantly, rising 42 percent between 2009 and 2010, and then another 43 percent between 2010 and 2011. Here's the trend:<o:p></o:p></div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 15pt; margin: 6pt 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal" align="center"> <div align="center"><img border="0" alt="" width="508" height="341" src="/uploads/Graphic_1_BT07.JPG" /></div> </div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 15pt; margin: 6pt 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal" align="left">Increases were particularly significant for domestic seafood processors, which received most of the letters during this period.<o:p></o:p> <div> </div> </div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal" align="left">Type of Seafood Firm Receiving a Warning Letter 2009 – 2011<o:p></o:p></div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 12pt; margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal" align="left"> </div> <div> <div align="center"><img border="0" alt="" width="484" height="310" src="/uploads/Graphic_2_BT07.JPG" /></div> </div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 15pt; margin: 6pt 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal">No seafood firm engaged solely in warehousing, transportation or retail was warned. But a broad range of processors and importers --- both small and large --- were, including a few to sophisticated processors of breaded, smoked and canned seafood. In recent months, however, more letters appear to be going to smaller firms --- making products like tuna sandwiches and salads. Typically, FDA cited a firm for a seafood HACCP violation and then added on other violations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify; line-height: 15pt; margin: 6pt 0in 0pt; mso-line-height-rule: exactly" class="MsoNormal"> <div align="center"><img border="0" alt="" width="437" height="235" src="/uploads/Graphic_3_BT07.JPG" /></div> </div> <div> The three most frequently cited deficiencies were ---<o:p></o:p> • Inadequate temperature controls - especially for histamine-forming species, pasteurized crabmeat, chilled vacuum-packed fish and ready-to-eat products;<o:p></o:p> • Lack of HACCP planning - especially for tuna sandwiches and sushi;<o:p></o:p> • Importers - lacking product specifications and verification steps.<o:p></o:p> There also appears to be more testing for Listeria during FDA inspections, which prompted more FDA comment about controlling it.<o:p></o:p> Most letters only reference the Seafood HACCP Guide and a FDA rule --- so they don't break new legal ground. However, every now and then a letter reveals a new or little known FDA enforcement policy. High-profile examples were two warning letters in 2009-2010, which cited the inclusion of ice glaze or frozen marinade in the net-weight label for shrimp. They were prompted in part by tests conducted by state weights and measures inspectors in 17 states that found glazing on frozen seafood wrongly included as part of the labeled net weight.<o:p></o:p> Nothing like that occurred in 2011 that but there were a few letters that caught my eye.<o:p></o:p> • A letter to an importer acknowledging that it could fulfill its HACCP verification requirement by sourcing from firms on the "List of Canadian Establishments Approved for Export" on the FDA website, but then warning that the importer “should maintain copies of that list demonstrating that, at the time of importation, the firm was listed as approved” --- something it had not been doing. (There's no FDA guidance referring to this policy.)<o:p></o:p> • Another importer gave FDA a copy of his foreign supplier's HACCP plan as its affirmative step, which FDA then reviewed and said was inadequate. (Having a copy of your supplier's HACCP plan is a common “affirmative step” --- but, as this letter illustrates, it exposes your supplier to violations that can be avoided if you chose another alternative.) <o:p></o:p> • A letter saying the Chesapeake Bay posed a reasonable risk of environmental contamination, requiring a primary processor to have HACCP controls when buying Croaker and Spot. <o:p></o:p> • A letter to a crab processor acknowledging that while it was “obtaining a certificate accompanying the live crab that indicates the area the crab was obtained from”, it was “not correlating the area information to information that identifies areas closed to harvesting or under consumption advisories.”<o:p></o:p> • A letter to a processor who was labeling and advertising fish as being low fat and useful in reducing body weight, leading to allegations of more than 20 misbranding violations. (Be careful about nutritional claims and what you say on your website.)<o:p></o:p> Looking Ahead<o:p></o:p> Changes in FDA enforcement policies (including an expansion of the authority of FDA Districts to issue letters) and increases in the number FDA inspectors and inspections are part of the reason why more Warning Letters were issued.<o:p></o:p> FDA reports that its inspections of “high-risk” food facilities rose 13 percent between FY 2009 and FY 2010. The FDA target for last year was 7,800 “high risk” facilities and the number of FDA inspections of foreign food facilities jumped from 171 to 438 between FY 2010 and FY 2011. (Statistics on seafood inspections are not available.)<o:p></o:p> The target for “high risk” facilities increased again this year to 8,850 and additional Congressional directives about inspections in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) are likely to further increase the number of letters in the future.<o:p></o:p> In the past, FDA was hesitant give foreign firms a Form FDA-483 (Inspectional Observations form) at the close-out of an inspection, and to send them Warning Letters. This clearly is changing --- although there has been no significant surge so far in the letters issued to foreign seafood processors.<o:p></o:p> The FSMA, however, directs the agency to inspect at least 1,200 foreign food facilities by this October --- an increase of more than 100% percent over last year --- which FDA told Congress “may be attainable”. FDA also plans to increase its assessments of the foreign regulatory programs from five to nine this year.<o:p></o:p> If these additional inspections do occur, there may be a corresponding increase in warning letters --- and import detentions.<o:p></o:p> Additional Help <o:p></o:p> While you can search the word “seafood” on the FDA website and find the warning letters alleging a seafood HACCP violation, you'll miss many other letters concerning seafood --- and there's no single word, or easy way to find them other than by reading the letters as they are posted each week on the FDA website.<o:p></o:p> So --- to help you find what FDA has said about seafood in the past, I'm posting my 2009-2011 tables for FTD subscribers. You also can search for company names or specific products or violations using the “search” feature on our website.<o:p></o:p> Your email comments to me on this issue are welcome. <o:p></o:p> Richard E. Gutting, Jr. regutting@rpb-law.com<o:p></o:p> </div>

Bạn đang đọc bài viết Big increase in number of FDA warning letters to seafood processors seen in 2011 tại chuyên mục News của Hiệp hội VASEP

TIN MỚI CẬP NHẬT

Da Nang completes EC recommendations, accelerates efforts to lift IUU “yellow card”

| 10:50 11/04/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Da Nang City has fully implemented all recommendations from the European Commission (EC) regarding the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, creating an important foundation for the removal of the “yellow card” in the near future.

Red tilapia farming opens up an effective economic development path in Da Nang

| 10:42 09/04/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In Hoa Vang district (Da Nang City), red tilapia farming is demonstrating clear economic efficiency, becoming a promising livelihood that helps many households increase their income. A notable example is the model of Mr. Huynh Ngoc Nam, who operates two red tilapia ponds covering more than 4 hectares, generating stable annual income.

Ninh Binh promotes tilapia farming with a focus on high-quality seed

| 10:30 06/04/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In Gia Vien district, tilapia farming—particularly the “duong nghiep” strain—is expanding rapidly and gradually becoming an efficient production model for local farmers. Hatcheries in the area are supplying high-quality, uniform, and disease-free fingerlings, meeting the growing demand for commercial farming.

Ca Mau promotes scaling up RAS-IMTA shrimp farming model toward sustainable development

| 10:11 01/04/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On the afternoon of March 19, Vice Chairman of the Ca Mau Provincial People’s Committee, Le Van Su, chaired a meeting to address bottlenecks and propose solutions to expand the super-intensive whiteleg shrimp farming model using low water exchange and high biosecurity standards (RAS-IMTA).

Ho Chi Minh City approves aquatic animal disease prevention and control plan for 2026–2030

| 10:07 30/03/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) On March 10, 2026, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee issued Decision No. 1377/QD-UBND approving the Aquatic Animal Disease Prevention and Control Plan for the 2026–2030 period. The decision takes effect from the date of signing and replaces previous plans for the 2021–2030 period that had been issued prior to the administrative merger in Ba Ria – Vung Tau, Binh Duong, and Ho Chi Minh City.

Chile’s tuna imports surge in 2025, can Vietnamese tuna accelerate?

| 09:59 28/03/2026

(vasep.com.vn) In 2025, Chile imported more than USD 156 million worth of tuna, up 8.1% compared to the previous year and the highest level in the past five years. As the supply structure in this market is rapidly shifting, Vietnamese tuna is facing both opportunities to expand market share and increasing competitive pressure from Thailand, Colombia, and China.

Vinh Long promotes sustainable development of brackish water shrimp farming

| 09:28 26/03/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Vinh Long Province is stepping up efforts to develop brackish water shrimp farming in a sustainable direction, identifying it as a key sector in its agricultural structure. In 2026, the province aims to reach around 71,300 hectares of shrimp farming, with an output of over 314,000 tons.

Ha Tinh tightens shrimp seed management to reduce risks for spring–summer crop

| 09:25 24/03/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Ha Tinh Province is strengthening control over shrimp seed quality to minimize risks for the 2026 spring–summer farming season.

Vietnam pangasius exports in February 2026: China remains the leading market

| 09:23 22/03/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) In February 2026, Vietnam’s pangasius exports reached USD 119 million, down slightly 5% year-on-year. However, thanks to strong performance in January, cumulative exports in the first two months of the year still reached USD 331 million, up 28% compared to the same period in 2025. Export activity slowed somewhat in February due to seasonal factors, particularly the Lunar New Year holiday, which disrupted production and shipments at many seafood processing enterprises.

Da Nang promotes high-tech shrimp farming

| 09:06 20/03/2026

(seafood.vasep.com.vn) Da Nang is accelerating the development of high-tech shrimp farming toward intensive production, disease control, and improved efficiency. Many shrimp farms have invested in automated environmental monitoring systems, continuously tracking indicators such as pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and salinity, enabling farmers to promptly adjust pond conditions and reduce disease risks.

Big increase in number of FDA warning letters to seafood processors seen in 2011

Tin cùng chuyên mục

Red tilapia farming opens up an effective economic development path in Da Nang

Ninh Binh promotes tilapia farming with a focus on high-quality seed

Ho Chi Minh City approves aquatic animal disease prevention and control plan for 2026–2030

Vietnam’s scallop exports surge amid global supply chain restructuring

Squid and Octopus Exports Show Strong Start in Early 2026, but Pressures Persist

Vietnam’s tilapia exports surge across multiple markets in February 2026

TIN MỚI CẬP NHẬT

Da Nang completes EC recommendations, accelerates efforts to lift IUU “yellow card”

Red tilapia farming opens up an effective economic development path in Da Nang

Ninh Binh promotes tilapia farming with a focus on high-quality seed

Ca Mau promotes scaling up RAS-IMTA shrimp farming model toward sustainable development

Ho Chi Minh City approves aquatic animal disease prevention and control plan for 2026–2030

Chile’s tuna imports surge in 2025, can Vietnamese tuna accelerate?

Vinh Long promotes sustainable development of brackish water shrimp farming

Ha Tinh tightens shrimp seed management to reduce risks for spring–summer crop

Vietnam pangasius exports in February 2026: China remains the leading market

Da Nang promotes high-tech shrimp farming

DANH MỤC